Skip to main content

Peacock v. State

Citations

  • 878 S.E.2d 247
  • 314 Ga. 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the jury was entitled to reject the defendant’s alternative hypothesis as unreasonable where the defendant told “stories that conflicted with other evidence”
  • holding that the circumstantial 14 evidence presented at trial was sufficient under OCGA § 24-14-6, as it authorized the jury to reject appellant’s alternative hypothesis that someone else killed the victims, given his “shifting stories that conflicted with other evidence”
  • holding that the circumstantial evidence presented at the appellant’s trial was sufficient under OCGA § 24- 14-6, as it authorized the jury to reject his alternative hypothesis that someone else killed the victims, given his “shifting stories that conflicted with other evidence”
  • “The felony offense of aggravated cruelty to animals and the misdemeanor offense of cruelty to animals are different offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.