Skip to main content

Daniel v. State

Citations

  • 485 S.E.2d 734
  • 268 Ga. 9
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1523
  • 1997 Ga. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s factual findings will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous
  • “[T]he State was not required to corroborate the officer’s testimony by proffering a videotape ofthe session at which the statement was made. The trial court was authorized to base its ruling on the testimony and credibility of the officer himself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.