Skip to main content
· 8/18/1983

Pisano v. American Leasing

Citations

  • 146 Cal. App. 3d 194
  • 194 Cal. Rptr. 77
  • 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1153
  • 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 2064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that causation is a required element in a claim for breach of express or implied warranty
  • explaining that, to succeed with a breach of warranty claim, the plaintiff must show that the warranty existed, that the defendant breached the warranty, and that the breach proximately caused the loss the plaintiff sustained
  • “Crucial to the inquiry is whether the product conformed to the standard performance of like products used in the trade”
  • “Crucial to the inquiry is whether the product conformed to the standard performance of like products used in the trade”
  • “Crucial to the inquiry is whether the product conformed to the standard performance of like products used in the trade”
  • “Crucial to the inquiry is whether the product conformed to the standard performance of like products used in the trade”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Low

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.