Lunghi v. Clark Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plain- ' tiffs were “correct in asserting that it was not their burden to show that the risks involved in the [product’s] design — the lack of mechanical safety devices, or of a warning — outweighed the-benefits of these aspects of its designs”
• “Clark’s knowledge of the injuries caused by these 26 27 1 In Count IV, Plaintiff alleges EzriCare is liable for both “negligence” and “gross negligence.” 1 features imposed a duty to warn of the danger, and/or a duty to conduct an adequate retrofit 2 campaign.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).