Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 5/21/2010

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N

Citations

  • 605 F.3d 665
  • 2010 WL 2011550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “good cause” 28 standard imposes a lower burden than the “compelling reasons” standard
  • holding that a “compelling reasons 14 ||standard applies to most [motions to seal] judicial records.”
  • holding that a “compelling reasons standard applies 16 ||to most [motions to seal] judicial records.”’
  • holding that a “compelling reasons 2 standard applies to most [motions to seal] judicial records.”
  • holding that a “compelling reasons 25 standard applies to most [motions to seal] judicial records.”
  • holding that the “good cause” 24 standard imposes a lower burden than the “compelling reasons” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Gould, Schroeder, Clifton, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.