James Duncan, Annette Duncan v. Kenneth S. Handmaker, Middleton & Reutlinger, P.S.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendants were lawyers, which contributed to create an issue of fact as to their knowledge that their request was illegal
• suggesting that an actual belief of legality suf- fices to defeat willfulness liability under FCRA
• noting that defendants were lawyers, which contributed to create an issue of fact as to their knowledge that their request was illegal
• suggesting that an actual belief of legality suffices to defeat willfulness liability under FCRA
• musing that it is “not altogether impossible” that an entity may obtain a consumer’s report for a permissible purpose where the dispute is unrelated to debt collection
• suggesting that an actual belief of legality suffices to defeat willfulness liability under FCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).