Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/28/2008

Pinkerton v. Spellings

Citations

  • 529 F.3d 513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “solely by reason of” language is the correct standard for determining whether a violation of Section 504 has occurred
  • stating that the “solely by reason of” language of Section 504(a), 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), is the correct standard for determining whether a violation of Section 504 has occurred
  • acknowledging Section 504’s heightened causation standard and rejecting the argument that Section 501 imposes the same heightened standard
  • “[T]he Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applies to federal government departments and agencies. By contrast, the ADA, enacted in 1990, explicitly excludes the federal government from coverage.”
  • “Under the ADA, discrimination need not be the sole reason for the adverse employment decision, but must actually play a role in the employer’s decision making process and have a determinative influence on the outcome.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Chief Judge, and Reavley and Smith, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pinkerton v. Spellings

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.