Fifth Circuit· 5/28/2008
Pinkerton v. Spellings
Citations
- 529 F.3d 513
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “solely by reason of” language is the correct standard for determining whether a violation of Section 504 has occurred
- stating that the “solely by reason of” language of Section 504(a), 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), is the correct standard for determining whether a violation of Section 504 has occurred
- acknowledging Section 504’s heightened causation standard and rejecting the argument that Section 501 imposes the same heightened standard
- “[T]he Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applies to federal government departments and agencies. By contrast, the ADA, enacted in 1990, explicitly excludes the federal government from coverage.”
- “Under the ADA, discrimination need not be the sole reason for the adverse employment decision, but must actually play a role in the employer’s decision making process and have a determinative influence on the outcome.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Chief Judge, and Reavley and Smith, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 357×
- Robert Bledsoe v. TVA Bd. of DirectorsSixth Circuit· 2022-07-27· cited 59×
- Jennifer Akridge v. Alfa Mutual Insurance CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2024-02-16· cited 57×
- Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. La. Health Serv. & Indem. Co.Fifth Circuit· 2019-03-19· cited 27×
- Shurb v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-School of MedicineS.D. Texas· 2014-10-24· cited 9×
- Jackson v. RheeDistrict of Columbia· 2011-11-29
- Alston v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-21
- Richardson v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-08
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—report No. 16-01Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-04-06
- Oakes v. Thurgood Marshall AcademyDistrict of Columbia· 2022-05-17
- Harmon v. CollierFifth Circuit· 2025-10-14
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 1,626×
- Rachid v. Jack In The Box IncFifth Circuit· 2004-06-25· cited 564×
- Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.D.C. Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 422×
- Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthSixth Circuit· 2004-03-04· cited 417×
- George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceFifth Circuit· 1981-11-05· cited 314×
- Katz v. City Metal Co.First Circuit· 1996-07-02· cited 268×
- John R. Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1997-02-13· cited 188×
- Bernard F. McNely v. Ocala Star-Banner Corporation, a Florida Corporation the New York Times Company, a Foreign CorporationEleventh Circuit· 1996-11-20· cited 185×
- Baird v. RoseFourth Circuit· 1999-10-07· cited 156×
- Matthew Head v. Glacier Northwest, Incorporated, a Washington CorporationNinth Circuit· 2005-07-06· cited 150×
- Rizzo v. Children's World Learning Centers, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1996-05-24· cited 146×
- Walter D. McGuinness v. United States Postal Service, Felix J. Jackson, and A.A. Winslow, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1984-10-05· cited 133×
- Juanita E. Foster v. Arthur Andersen, LLPSeventh Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 132×
- Sutton v. LaderEleventh Circuit· 1999-08-25· cited 118×
- Leary v. NAVY, SecretaryFirst Circuit· 1995-06-14· cited 114×
- Amador Rivera v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Luis A. Palau and Edward G. DolanSecond Circuit· 1998-09-16· cited 96×
- Soledad v. United States Department of TreasuryFifth Circuit· 2002-09-12· cited 94×
- David L. Hypes, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Child Sarah Hypes, and Megan Hypes v. First Commerce CorporationFirst Circuit· 1998-02-12· cited 93×
- Mack H. Williams v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, AgencyTenth Circuit· 1996-03-26· cited 84×
- Betty I. Hardy Hall, Cross-Appellee v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Cross-AppellantFifth Circuit· 1991-08-02· cited 78×
Other cases named Pinkerton v. Spellings
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.