Soledad v. United States Department of Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[b]ecause Congress chose not to repeal the ‘solely by reason of’ language of § 794(a) when it amended the statute, . . . Congress did not intend to adopt the ADA standard of causation with the § 794(d) amendment.”
• noting that a plaintiff must show “(1) that she belongs to a protected group; (2) that she was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) that the harassment complained of was based on her disability or disabilities; (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).