David L. Hypes, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Child Sarah Hypes, and Megan Hypes v. First Commerce Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even if plaintiff’s absences were linked to his alleged disability, plaintiff was still not a “qualified individual” for ADA purposes because (1) attendance was an essential function of his job and (2
• holding that, even if plaintiff's absences were linked to his alleged disability, plaintiff was still not a “qualified individual” for ADA purposes because (1) attendance was an essential function of his job and (2
• finding loan analyst’s position required physical presence because position required teamwork
• loan review analyst who used confidential documents that could not leave the office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).