Pinecrest Lakes, Inc. v. Shidel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court was not required to balance equities before issuing an injunction to enforce a development ordinance because statute authorizing action said nothing about weighing equities
• holding that consistency with a Comprehensive Plan is not a discretionary matter
• ordering destruction of a completed building erected in violation of zoning law
• “Under [the earlier version of] section 163.3215 citizen enforcement is the primary tool for insuring consistency of development decisions with the Comprehensive Plan.”
• where statute specified injunctive relief for zoning violation, legislature created rule, “not a grant of discretion”
• county's interpretation of own comprehensive plan entitled to no weight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).