Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that block zoning ordinances could constitute a taking, but holding that the challenged ordinance did not do so
• concluding that a municipality could exclude apartment buildings because they would destroy the “residential character of the neighborhood”
• concluding that a municipality could exclude apartment buildings because they would destroy the \residential character of the neighborhood\
• holding that a 75% value diminution caused by a zoning law did not constitute a taking
• recognizing that block zoning ordinances could constitute a taking, but holding that the challenged ordinance did not do so
• holding that zoning laws “must find their justification in some aspect of the police power, asserted for the public welfare”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).