BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF BREVARD v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the rulings of a board acting in its quasi-judicial capacity are subject to review by certiorari\ in the circuit court
• holding that the board is not required to make findings of fact; in order to sustain the board's action on certiorari review, it must be shown that there was competent substantial evidence to support the board's ruling
• holding the rezoning of 75 acres on the north side of a single rural road to be a legislative decision
• explaining that “the rulings of a board acting in its quasi-judicial capacity [would be] subject to review by certiorari and . . . upheld only if . . . supported by substantial competent evidence”
• observing “[t]he present use of land may, by zoning ordinance, continue to be more limited than the future use contemplated by the comprehensive plan”
• examining strict scrutiny as a term of art warranting significantly different standards of review in the different contexts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).