Skip to main content

Pincus v. Dubyak

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3034

Syllabus

Civ.R. 12(C) judgment on pleadings Civ.R. 15(A) amending pleadings R.C. 2305.11(A) statute of limitations R.C. 2305.19(A) savings statute legal malpractice attorney-client relationship power of attorney. The trial court erred when it granted the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings on the plaintiff's claim for legal malpractice brought in her individual capacity. The trial court also abused its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to amend her complaints. The plaintiff's first and second amended complaints contained allegations to establish that an attorney-client relationship existed between her and the attorney, not just between the attorney and her husband pursuant to a power of attorney.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pincus v. Dubyak

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.