Skip to main content

Patterson v. V & M Auto Body

Citations

  • 63 Ohio St. 3d 573
  • 589 N.E.2d 1306
  • 1992 Ohio LEXIS 837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sole proprietorship was not a separate legal entity capable of being sued under Ohio law
  • holding that a sole proprietorship was not a separate legal entity capable of being sued under Ohio law
  • explaining that judgment rendered against a defendant not a legal entity is void but an action is commenced if service is obtained within one year upon an incorrectly named defendant whose name is later corrected under Ohio Civ. R. 3(A)
  • “Doing business under another name does not create an entity distinct from the person operating the business.”
  • finding a municipality’s fire department was not a separate entity, and the real party in interest is the municipality itself
  • it is within the trial court’s discretion to grant a motion to amend a complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.