Pinckney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that if defendant “was not ‘in custody’ for Miranda purposes until after he made his [statement], there are no grounds for suppressing the statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vergara v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-02-25· cited 124×
• State v. Carder
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-11· cited 6×
• Estuardo Bernal v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-03-16

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• Oregon v. Mathiason
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
• Stansbury v. California
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
• State v. Ritter
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-09· cited 45×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-07-02· cited 32×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-06-24· cited 26×
• State v. Brannan
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-07-30· cited 25×
• Woods v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-09-05· cited 17×
• Gabbard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-06-26· cited 17×
• Vaughn v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-11-15· cited 13×
• Sims v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-02-22· cited 9×
• Presley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-10· cited 6×
• Jenkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-02· cited 6×