Benzine v. Kum Sun Benzine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court erred by failing to make sufficient written findings under the statute because it made no written findings
• reversing based on the lack of written findings as required by Code § 20-107.1(F) and remanding “for reconsideration of the spousal support issue based on the existing record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).