Skip to main content

Pigford v. Glickman

Citations

  • 185 F.R.D. 82
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5220
  • 1999 WL 221590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving class settlement and rejecting class member objection that \the absence of any such prospective injunctive relief renders the settlement as a whole unfair\
  • approving class settlement and rejecting class member objection that “the absence of any such prospective injunctive relief renders the settlement as a whole unfair”
  • comparing the process, burden of proof, and relief available for Track A and Track B claimants
  • comparing the process, burden of proof, and relief available for Track A and Track B claimants
  • noting as a factor weighing in favor of settlement approval that “there are relatively few objections to the settlement in comparison with the size of the class”
  • considering the fact that “bringing this case to trial likely would have been a very complex, long and costly proposition” in evaluating the class’s likely recovery if the case had proceeded to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pigford v. Glickman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.