Bennett v. Behring Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he equitable theory of unconscionability has never been utilized to allow for the affirmative recovery of money damages.”
• “there [was] no proffered evidence in [the] voluminous record to establish that the price being paid by plaintiffs grossly exceeds that being paid by other similarly situated consumers in a similar transaction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).