· 10/3/2006
Pierce v. DIMA CORP.(1992)
Citations
- 721 N.W.2d 627
- 2006 Minn. App. LEXIS 143
- 2006 WL 2807012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling as a matter of law that an employee’s single instance of violating employer’s cash- register policy did not constitute employment misconduct when there was no evidence that the employee’s act had a significant adverse impact on the employer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willis, Ross, Forsberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.