Skip to main content
· 10/3/2006

Pierce v. DIMA CORP.(1992)

Citations

  • 721 N.W.2d 627
  • 2006 Minn. App. LEXIS 143
  • 2006 WL 2807012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling as a matter of law that an employee’s single instance of violating employer’s cash- register policy did not constitute employment misconduct when there was no evidence that the employee’s act had a significant adverse impact on the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Ross, Forsberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.