Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that theft of food involving a minimal dollar value was employment misconduct because the employer could no longer trust the employee to handle money and accounts for sales, an essential part of a cashier’s position
• stating that “[c]redibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal”
• stating that “[c]redibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal”
• stating that we will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them
• stating that it is ULJ’s responsibility to make credibility determinations
• opting to examine employee’s conduct 5 “in the context of her job responsibilities” rather than the significance of the adverse impact on the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).