Pierce v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court abused its discretion by denying motion under § 406(b) as untimely after court denied as premature the same motion when it was filed prior to award of benefits
• holding that district court abused its discretion by denying motion under § 406(b) as untimely after court denied as premature the same motion when it was filed prior to award of benefits
• “These initial [EAJA attorneys’ fee] applications were premature. . . . The district court denied the applications.”
• Rule 54(d)(2)’s 14-day limit applies and should begin running from the date the award notice is issued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).