Jeter v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts can consider the lodestar calculation as one measure in determining whether the contingency fee is reasonable and not a windfall
• “[C]ourts may consider the lodestar in their analyses so long as the court can articulate additional factors demonstrating 5 that the excessively high fee would result in an unearned advantage.”
• “[T]he lodestar calculation alone cannot constitute the basis for an ‘unreasonable’ finding. ... [T]he district court must also articulate the factors that demonstrate to the court that the fee is unearned.”
• \[T]he lodestar calculation alone cannot constitute the basis for an 'unreasonable' finding. . . . [T]he district court must also articulate the factors that demonstrate to the court that the fee is unearned\
• noting factors that might be considered in the windfall analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).