District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/6/2013
Pickett v. State
Citations
- 109 So. 3d 841
- 2013 WL 811642
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if the error in the jury instruction constituted fundamental error, the defendant [Pickett] affirmatively agreed to the instruction and “[i]n doing so, Pickett waived his right to raise this issue on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emas, Logue, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 308×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 206×
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-08-26· cited 141×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-21· cited 105×
- DuBoise v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 88×
- Calloway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-29· cited 17×
- Battle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 12×
- Jomolla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24· cited 10×
- Tindall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-02· cited 10×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-26· cited 10×
- Jimenez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-13· cited 7×
- Falwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-27· cited 7×
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-10· cited 5×
- Martinez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.