Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 41 So. 3d 259
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7325
  • 2010 WL 2076918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was fundamental error to instruct the jury on an uncharged theory of the offense because it was possible, based on the State’s argument and the evidence presented, that the jury found the uncharged theory of the offense
  • reversing for a new trial where the manner in which the crime was committed differed from what was charged in the information
  • “[Wjhere an offense may be committed in various ways, the evidence must establish it to have been committed in the manner charged — ” (alteration in original) (quoting Zwick v. State, 730 So.2d 759, 760 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson, Gross, Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.