Supreme Court of Florida· 7/21/1983
State v. Gray
Citations
- 435 So. 2d 816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a showing of specific intent is not necessary for conviction under section 918.14(3)
- holding that the predecessor to this statute did not create a specific intent crime
- holding that the predecessor to this statute did not create a specific intent crime
- a conviction cannot rest on an indictment which fails to allege one or more essential elements of the crime
- where an indictment or information wholly fails to allege one or more essential elements of a crime, it fails to charge a crime under the laws of the state
- the information, which was drafted substantially in the language of the statute, was sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-07-12· cited 570×
- People v. MelilloSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-05-29· cited 267×
- Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-29· cited 95×
- Carbajal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-11-03· cited 91×
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-10-25· cited 63×
- State v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida· 1985-02-07· cited 55×
- Jaimes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-12-09· cited 54×
- B.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 44×
- Firestone v. News-Press Pub. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-02-02· cited 41×
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 37×
- Torrence v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-04· cited 34×
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
- State v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-13· cited 31×
- Schmitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-13· cited 30×
- Connolly, Jr. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 23×
- Rose v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-09· cited 22×
- Leath v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 21×
- Dept. of Ins. v. Dade Cty. Consumer Adv.Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-03· cited 20×
- State v. BrighamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-07· cited 19×
- Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-18· cited 18×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 2,351×
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,904×
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,240×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 831×
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 767×
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court· 1922-03-27· cited 605×
- Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1963-11-07· cited 210×
- Ah Sin v. WittmanSupreme Court· 1905-05-29· cited 111×
- State v. DyeSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-19· cited 74×
- State v. MedlinSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-02-14· cited 56×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-08· cited 53×
- Lackos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-11-04· cited 52×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 47×
- Catanese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-05-26· cited 33×
- Tracey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1961-05-31· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.