Skip to main content

State v. Gray

Citations

  • 435 So. 2d 816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a showing of specific intent is not necessary for conviction under section 918.14(3)
  • holding that the predecessor to this statute did not create a specific intent crime
  • holding that the predecessor to this statute did not create a specific intent crime
  • a conviction cannot rest on an indictment which fails to allege one or more essential elements of the crime
  • where an indictment or information wholly fails to allege one or more essential elements of a crime, it fails to charge a crime under the laws of the state
  • the information, which was drafted substantially in the language of the statute, was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.