Phillips v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing claim although “recognizing the limited usefulness of the court’s articulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. Partnership
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 29×
• Lynch v. Lynch
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-04-24· cited 14×
• Schwartz v. Family Dental Group, P.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-08· cited 11×
• Crews v. Crews
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-29· cited 10×
• Leichter v. Lebanon Board of Education
  D. Connecticut· 2013-01-09· cited 10×
• Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-16· cited 8×
• Szynkowicz v. Szynkowicz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-02-05· cited 5×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Narumanchi v. DeStefano
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-28· cited 44×
• Lambert v. Donahue
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-05· cited 30×
• Duplissie v. Devino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-25· cited 27×
• Greenburg v. Greenburg
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-02-11· cited 26×
• Highgate Condominium Ass'n v. Watertown Fire District
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-07· cited 22×
• Giametti v. Inspections, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-22· cited 22×
• Harold Cohn & Co. v. Harco International, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-03· cited 20×
• Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 16×
• Santana v. City of Hartford
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-21· cited 15×
• Coscina v. Coscina
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-03-05· cited 11×
• Cadle Co. v. Ginsberg
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-09· cited 11×
• Connecticut Properties Tri-Town Plaza, LLC v. Seymour Cinema, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-17· cited 2×