D. Oregon· 4/2/2013
Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.
Citations
- 938 F. Supp. 2d 1055
- 2013 WL 1403060
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- under Oregon law, plaintiff must present expert testimony on both general and specific causation to survive summary judgment in pharmaceutical product liability case
- under Oregon law, plaintiff must present expert testimony on both general and specific causation to survive summary judgment in pharmaceutical product liability case
- “Under Oregon law, when the element of causation involves a complex medical question, a plaintiff must present expert testimony that there is a reasonable medical probability of causation”
- “Under Oregon law, when the element of causation involves a complex medical question, a plaintiff must present expert testimony that there is a reasonable medical probability of causation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aiken, Coffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Theresa Huck v. Wyeth, Inc. D/B/A Wyeth Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Pliva, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-11· cited 37×
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2016-07-28· cited 25×
- In Re Reglan LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-08-22· cited 24×
- In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)S.D. Illinois· 2019-06-11· cited 21×
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationD. South Carolina· 2017-01-03· cited 19×
- Hassett v. DafoeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-29· cited 15×
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-06-13· cited 14×
- In re Reglan/Metoclopramide LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-29· cited 11×
- In re Fosamax Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-08-15· cited 3×
- Allbright v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2017-12-01
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthNinth Circuit· 1991-12-24· cited 9,433×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 2,291×
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1952-11-10· cited 1,298×
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 956×
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedNinth Circuit· 1981-08-31· cited 782×
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-04-25· cited 722×
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court· 1925-01-05· cited 673×
- Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1993-01-12· cited 575×
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1993-02-26· cited 209×
- Richard Stengel v. Medtronic IncorporatedNinth Circuit· 2013-01-10· cited 153×
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court· 1968-06-14· cited 111×
- Michael A. Nemir, M.D. v. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation Chrysler CorporationSixth Circuit· 2004-10-28· cited 77×
- McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 74×
- Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-02-12· cited 63×
- Smith v. Wyeth, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 62×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2002-12-20· cited 57×
Other cases named Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.