Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that OCC’s construction of incidental powers of national banks as encompassing provision of ATM services to non-depositors at a charge was reasonable and thus entitled to great weight
• federal regulations allowing banks to collect non-interest charges preempted a local law governing what ATM fees a bank could charge
• “[Because there has been a history of significant federal presence in national banking, the presumption against preemption of state law is inapplicable.”
• “[B]ecause there has been a history of significant federal presence in national banking, the presumption against preemption of state law is inapplicable.”
• “Section 1693q’s reference to ‘this subchapter’ indicates that the EFTA’s anti-preemption provision does not apply to other statutes.”
• “[B]e-cause there has been a ‘history of significant federal presence’ in national banking, the presumption against preemption of state law is inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).