Pfizer, Inc. v. Farsian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one who had received a manufactured heart valve could not recover damages based on speculation that the valve might fail
• holding that a plaintiff's belief that a product that is \presently functioning normally\ could fail in the future is not, without more, a legal injury sufficient to support plaintiff's claim
• “Under Alabama law, Farsian’s fear that his [defectively designed heart] valve could fail in the future is not, without more, a legal injury sufficient to support his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).