Williamson v. Indianapolis Life Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The reasoning of the Texas court is applicable in Alabama as well .\
• “Although there are projections suggesting that the agent’s alleged representation [that premiums would ‘vanish’ in 2002] was false, there is absolutely no way to know whether this representation was true or was false, until the end of the year 2002.”
• “[Bjecause the performance of the policies is directly related to interest rates, Williamson today can only speculate that the policies will not sustain themselves as he claims he was promised. We conclude that Williamson had suffered no discernible injury when he filed his action.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).