Skip to main content
· 3/17/2000

Jarman v. United Industries Corp.

Citations

  • 98 F. Supp. 2d 757
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6974
  • 2000 WL 664733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing fraud, warranty, and various statutory claims for purchase of allegedly ineffective pesticide where there is no allegation of actual product failure
  • dismissing fraud, warranty, and various statutory claims for purchase of allegedly ineffective pesticide where there is no allegation of actual product failure
  • analyzing negligent misrepresentation, breach of implied and express warranties, fraud, and unjust enrichment claims
  • “[Ujnless there is actually a failure in product performance, there is no basis at all for claiming that the plaintiff has been damaged in any way.”
  • if the undeniable practical effect of the plaintiff's recovery would be the imposition of additional labeling standards not mandated by FIFRA, plaintiff's claim is preempted
  • if the undeniable practical effect of the plaintiffs recovery would be the imposition of additional labeling standards not mandated by FIFRA, plaintiffs claim is preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom S. Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.