Skip to main content
· 7/22/1974

Deaile v. General Telephone Co. of California

Citations

  • 40 Cal. App. 3d 841
  • 115 Cal. Rptr. 582
  • 1974 Cal. App. LEXIS 909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that excessive publication can defeat the privilege
  • applying qualified privilege to intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, where only conduct alleged to be outrageous was privileged communication
  • privilege applied in action for intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful discharge
  • privilege applied in action for intentional infliction of emotional distress
  • privilege applied in action for intentional infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.