Petsch-Schmid v. Boston Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• entering summary judgment for defendant on MEPA claim where no evidence of comparators was presented
• dismissing defamation claim concerning employer's alleged statements to unemployment authorities on the ground that such statements are absolutely privileged pursuant to M.G.L. c. 151A § 46
• genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on question of whether employee was terminated in violation of Massachusetts antidiscrimination law due to her supervisor's belief that she had multiple sclerosis
• dismissing MEPA claim for failing to identify male comparator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).