Skip to main content
· 7/15/2005

Ingram v. Brinks Incorporated

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 222
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14327
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,004
  • 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 161
  • 2005 WL 1655200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that summary judg ment cannot be avoided by relying on improbable inferences or conclusory allegations
  • under G. L. c. 151B, without an adverse discriminatory decision within the limitations period, “discrimination inquiry simply stops”
  • “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
  • “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
  • “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Gertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.