First Circuit· 7/15/2005
Ingram v. Brinks Incorporated
Citations
- 414 F.3d 222
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14327
- 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,004
- 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 161
- 2005 WL 1655200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that summary judg ment cannot be avoided by relying on improbable inferences or conclusory allegations
- under G. L. c. 151B, without an adverse discriminatory decision within the limitations period, “discrimination inquiry simply stops”
- “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
- “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
- “[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Gertner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maymi v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityFirst Circuit· 2008-01-30· cited 190×
- Colon-Fontanez v. Municipality of San JuanFirst Circuit· 2011-10-12· cited 163×
- Freadman v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceFirst Circuit· 2007-04-18· cited 141×
- Fontanez-Nunez v. Janssen Ortho LLCFirst Circuit· 2006-05-08· cited 116×
- Enica v. PrincipiFirst Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 97×
- Rios-Jimenez v. PrincipiFirst Circuit· 2008-03-12· cited 89×
- Velázquez-Fernández v. NCE Foods, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-01-26· cited 76×
- Hoyos v. Telecorp Communications, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-05-18· cited 67×
- Everett v. 357 Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-04-13· cited 60×
- Martínez-Rodríguez v. GuevaraFirst Circuit· 2010-03-01· cited 57×
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Municipality of GuayanillaFirst Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 50×
- Velez v. Janssen Ortho, LLCFirst Circuit· 2006-11-03· cited 48×
- Snell v. NevilleFirst Circuit· 2021-05-25· cited 46×
- Donnell Johnson v. William Mahoney, Daniel Keeler, the City of Boston and Paul F. EvansFirst Circuit· 2005-09-20· cited 33×
- Goncalves v. Plymouth County Sheriff's DepartmentFirst Circuit· 2011-10-07· cited 29×
- Faiola v. APCO Graphics, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-12-10· cited 24×
- Mariasch v. Gillette Co.First Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 23×
- Oberg v. City of TauntonD. Massachusetts· 2013-09-25· cited 15×
- Merrill Lynch v. Flanders-BordenFirst Circuit· 2021-08-26· cited 13×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Locke Capital Management, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 2011-06-30· cited 11×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyFirst Circuit· 1991-12-16· cited 1,952×
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.First Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 1,440×
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 1,323×
- Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-09-30· cited 231×
- Sharon D. Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, Incorporated, Sharon D. Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1994-09-26· cited 171×
- Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-07-12· cited 165×
- Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.First Circuit· 2004-03-18· cited 141×
- Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-05-12· cited 101×
- Carol Broadus v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2000-09-12· cited 42×
- Petsch-Schmid v. Boston Edison Co.D. Massachusetts· 1996-02-02· cited 24×
- Desrosiers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1995-04-27· cited 19×
- Gunther v. Gap, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1998-03-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.