Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/16/1983
Peterson v. State
Citations
- 645 S.W.2d 807
- 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 900
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to constitute theft, intent to deprive owner must exist at time property is taken
- holding that when “money . . . was voluntarily given to appellant pursuant to a contractual agreement, [and] there is insufficient evidence in the record to show the money was obtained by deception, the conviction cannot stand”
- holding evidence legally insufficient to show criminal intent to commit theft when evidence showed that Peterson failed to complete construction of project that was 95% complete
- “Relevant intent to deprive the owner of property is the accused’s intent at the time of the taking.”
- “Relevant intent to deprive the owner of property is the accused’s intent at the time of the taking.”
- to constitute theft, intent to deprive owner must exist at time property is taken
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-22· cited 232×
- Daugherty, Tonya JeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-01-09· cited 202×
- Wirth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-03-21· cited 94×
- Christensen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-12-05· cited 90×
- Thomason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-21· cited 84×
- Baker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-12-30· cited 72×
- Jacobs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-27· cited 62×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-01· cited 48×
- Taylor, Henry Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-12-10· cited 36×
- Ellis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-05-12· cited 32×
- Roper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-21· cited 30×
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-02-13· cited 23×
- McElroy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1984-01-23· cited 14×
- Wirth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-10-20· cited 11×
- Mattiza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 8×
- State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-10-10· cited 7×
- Henke v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-04-16· cited 6×
- Mendoza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-02· cited 6×
- Wirth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-06-03· cited 3×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.