Skip to main content

Peterson v. State

Citations

  • 645 S.W.2d 807
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to constitute theft, intent to deprive owner must exist at time property is taken
  • holding that when “money . . . was voluntarily given to appellant pursuant to a contractual agreement, [and] there is insufficient evidence in the record to show the money was obtained by deception, the conviction cannot stand”
  • holding evidence legally insufficient to show criminal intent to commit theft when evidence showed that Peterson failed to complete construction of project that was 95% complete
  • “Relevant intent to deprive the owner of property is the accused’s intent at the time of the taking.”
  • “Relevant intent to deprive the owner of property is the accused’s intent at the time of the taking.”
  • to constitute theft, intent to deprive owner must exist at time property is taken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.