Skip to main content
· 11/21/1990

Mattiza v. State

Citations

  • 801 S.W.2d 195
  • 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 2824
  • 1990 WL 180673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that evidence must show that defendant intended to deprive owner of property at time that it was taken
  • stating that intent can be inferred from conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul Pressler, Sears and Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.