Wirth v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Brooks overruled Clewis, vacating court of appeals opinion finding evidence factually insufficient, and remanding for reconsideration pursuant to Brooks
• stating that Brooks overruled Clewis , vacating court of appeals opinion finding evidence factually insufficient, and remanding for reconsideration pursuant to Brooks
• confirming that Clewis v. State , 922 S.W.2d 126 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), was overruled by Brooks v. State , 323 S.W.3d 893, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010)
• remanding a case that the court of appeals had reversed for factual insufficiency and ordering that court to reconsider its decision in light of Brooks
• remanding a case that the court of appeals had reversed for factual insufficiency and ordering that court to reconsider its decision in light of Brooks
• remanding a case that the court of appeals reversed for factual insufficiency before the court of criminal appeals handed down Brooks and ordering that court to reconsider its decision in light of Brooks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).