Skip to main content

Wirth v. State

Citations

  • 361 S.W.3d 694
  • 2012 WL 931978
  • 2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we consider events occurring before, during and after the offense and may rely on the defendant’s actions which show an understanding and common design to do the prohibited act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wirth v. State

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.