S.D. New York· 3/28/2013
Peterson v. Regina
Citations
- 935 F. Supp. 2d 628
- 2013 WL 1294594
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff’s offer of his “suspicions of impropriety as proof of the defendants’ misconduct before the grand jury” insufficient to rebut presumption
- granting summary judgment on malicious prosecution claim where the plaintiff did not present any “competing testimony plus” and therefore did not rebut the presumption of probable cause
- “[Plaintiff] has supplied only his suspicions of impropriety as proof of the defendants’ misconduct before the grand jury.”
- respectfully declining to apply Tromp to bar Plaintiff’s claim because Tromp did not consider the relevant precedent
- \[T]he meaning of an ambiguous agreement as to which no extrinsic evidence exists is a question of law to be determined solely by the court.\
- “It is settled that joinder is improper where ‘the plaintiff does no more than assert that the defendants merely committed the same type of violation in the same way.’” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorenstein, Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kalie v. Bank of America Corp.S.D. New York· 2013-08-09· cited 307×
- Soto v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 2015-09-18· cited 33×
- Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2014-12-11· cited 7×
- Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.S.D. New York· 2013-11-04· cited 5×
- Kress Stores of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.First Circuit· 2024-11-12· cited 5×
- Bennett v. FCA US LLC (In re Old Carco LLC)S.D. New York· 2018-06-26· cited 4×
- United States ex rel. Doe v. Taconic Hills Central School DistrictS.D. New York· 2014-03-25· cited 3×
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Pass & Seymour, Inc.E.D. New York· 2017-08-29· cited 3×
- Philip Morris USA Inc., and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Beatrice Skolnick, as personal representative of the Estate of Leo SkolnickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-15
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 16,767×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- George v. SmithSeventh Circuit· 2007-11-09· cited 4,390×
- Rehberg v. PaulkSupreme Court· 2012-04-02· cited 808×
- Derry Sykes v. John James, New York State Parole OfficerSecond Circuit· 1993-12-30· cited 642×
- Scotto v. AlmenasSecond Circuit· 1998-05-05· cited 563×
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Second Circuit· 1992-03-23· cited 431×
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Second Circuit· 2004-01-23· cited 391×
- United States v. James v. Aquavella and Salmon C. HarveySecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 383×
- Brandon v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2010-03-30· cited 362×
- Kehr Ex Rel. Kehr v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USAS.D. New York· 2008-12-05· cited 352×
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 348×
- Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Carwile, P.C.Second Circuit· 2010-02-18· cited 302×
- Golden Pacific Bancorp, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2001-12-07· cited 264×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.