Peters v. Bodin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right to recovery for loss-of-consortium damages “is derivative only, so that if [the physically-injured spouse] has no valid claim for such injuries, [the other spouse] is likewise without right to recover for [loss-of-consortium] damages”
• describing loss of consortium as special damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).