Ristau v. Riley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of a parent-child relation alone does not permit an inference that one is the servant or agent of the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frankle v. Twedt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1951-04-20· cited 59×
• Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-07-29· cited 59×
• Peters v. Bodin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-07-09· cited 18×
• Knutson v. Nielsen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1959-11-06· cited 15×
• Webber v. Seymour
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-02-08· cited 12×
• Halloran v. Tousignant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-03-24· cited 7×
• Wick v. Widdell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-02-17· cited 7×
• O'Brien Entertainment Agency, Inc. v. Wolfgramm
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-09· cited 1×
• Simcoe v. Pope
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-08-02· cited 1×
• Schultz v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1973-05-23· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. Kujath
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1947-11-28· cited 54×
• Foster v. Bock
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1949-11-25· cited 22×