Nebraska Supreme Court· 3/8/1985
Johnston v. State
Citations
- 364 N.W.2d 1
- 219 Neb. 457
- 1985 Neb. LEXIS 949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the evidence is sufficient to permit the triers of fact to find that the psychological injury is directly related to the accident and the employee is unable to work, the employee is entitled to be compensated
- \`Generally [one spouse's] cause of action for loss of consortium ... does not exist ... unless the defendant would have been liable for [the other spouse's personal injury].'\
- where workers’ compensation is exclusive remedy, spouse cannot maintain independent cause of action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Hastings, Grant, McCown, Warren, Blue, Colwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bennett v. Saint Elizabeth Health SystemsNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-03-30· cited 54×
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-20· cited 44×
- Canas v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-08-24· cited 34×
- Sweeney v. Kerstens & Lee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2004-10-22· cited 34×
- Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-10-11· cited 24×
- McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-28· cited 22×
- Sorenson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-10-28· cited 20×
- Millard v. Hyplains Dressed Beef, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-04-19· cited 19×
- Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-02-02· cited 18×
- Erickson v. U-Haul Intern.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-07-02· cited 16×
- P.A.M. v. Quad L. AssociatesNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-01-24· cited 15×
- Abbott v. Gould, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-07-21· cited 14×
- Jackson v. Travelers InsuranceS.D. Iowa· 1998-12-24· cited 10×
- Simms v. Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 4×
- Haumont v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 3×
- Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Court of Appeals· 2006-03-21· cited 2×
- Hallett v. George A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-05
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-10-24· cited 149×
- Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-06-29· cited 71×
- Bekelski v. O. F. Neal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1942-06-26· cited 32×
- Shaw v. Boston American League Baseball Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-03-06· cited 26×
- Cardenas v. Peterson Bean Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-07-15· cited 26×
- Marlow v. Maple Manor ApartmentsNebraska Supreme Court· 1975-05-01· cited 23×
- Ziegler v. United States Gypsum CompanySupreme Court of Iowa· 1960-04-05· cited 18×
- Peters v. BodinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-07-09· cited 18×
- Doty v. Aetna Life & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-05-25· cited 16×
- Naphtali v. LafazanNew York Supreme Court· 1957-06-29· cited 15×
- Balcer v. Leonard Refineries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court· 1963-07-17· cited 14×
- Vangreen v. Interstate MacHinery & Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-11-10· cited 10×
- Haskett v. National Biscuit CompanyNebraska Supreme Court· 1964-11-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.