Skip to main content
· 9/29/2008

Peter B. v. United States

Citations

  • 579 F. Supp. 2d 78
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75428
  • 2008 WL 4381547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It seems clear (albeit counterintuitive), then, that as CLA employees are expressly excluded from the review procedures under [the CSRA,] they may not seek outside of the CSRA scheme any judicial review of 14 termination decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.