Klugel v. Small

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the EEOC’s interpretation of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105, and reason- ing that a narrower reading “would inappropriately turn the informal counseling requirement into an unwarranted proce- dural hurdle”
• \An employee who believes that she has been the subject of discrimination must timely (1) contact an agency official 'logically connected' with the EEO process (not necessarily a Counselor) . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).