· 5/5/2006
Tootle v. Secretary of the Navy
Citations
- 446 F.3d 167
- 371 U.S. App. D.C. 28
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11189
- 2006 WL 1192865
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a district court has jurisdiction over a plaintiffs record correction claim even if such a correction would entitle him to retirement benefits
- explaining that a court may look to certain materials beyond the pleadings to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts when considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)
- \[Having dismissed] for want of subject matter jurisdiction ... the trial court was without authority to transfer the case.\
- “[Having dismissed] for want of subject matter jurisdiction . . . the trial court was without authority to transfer the case.”
- observing that “retirement itself has non-negligible value”
- “A district court must dismiss an action where ... it concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Garland, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.