Perry v. State
Citations
- 41 Tex. 488
Syllabus
<p>1. Habeas corpus not an appeal.—The writ of habeas corpus is not designed to operate as a writ of error or certiorari, and does not have their effect; it however deals with irregularities which render proceedings void.</p> <p>2. Habeas corpus—Former conviction.—The court on habeas corpus will not, for the purpose of discharging the applicant, consider the sufficiency of facts relied on as evidencing a former conviction for the same offense for which he is in custody.</p>
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-02· cited 193×
- Ex Parte BanksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-03-29· cited 138×
- Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court· 1884-02-01· cited 67×
- Ex Parte Tuan Van TruongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-05-10· cited 43×
- Ex parte LargentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1942-04-08· cited 37×
- Milliken v. City CouncilTexas Supreme Court· 1881-03-11· cited 36×
- Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court· 1897-08-31· cited 36×
- Ex parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1940-05-01· cited 25×
- In re BionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-09-12· cited 25×
- In re BettsNebraska Supreme Court· 1893-02-15· cited 14×
- Pitner v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 12×
- Ex parte CooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1911-02-08· cited 7×
- Ex parte BolandCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01· cited 4×
- Ex parte CallCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01· cited 2×
- Brill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Ex parte ScwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1877-07-01
- Ex parte RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1881-07-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.