Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/1/1940
Ex parte Patterson
Citations
- 139 Tex. Crim. 489
- 141 S.W.2d 319
- 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a mere irregularity in a judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but \the matter was not a subject for the granting of the writ of habeas corpus\
- a mere irregularity in a judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but “the matter was not a subject for the granting of the writ of habeas corpus”
- a mere irregularity in a judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but “the matter was not a subject for the granting of the writ of habeas corpus”
- a mere irregularity in a judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but \the matter was not a subject for the granting of the writ of habeas corpus\
- mere irregularity in judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but was not subject for granting Writ of habeas corpus
- a mere irregularity in a judgment may be corrected by nunc pro tunc proceeding, but \the matter was not a subject for the granting of the writ of habeas corpus\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graves, Hawkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-06· cited 421×
- Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-27· cited 381×
- Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 147×
- Ex Parte PenaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-13· cited 145×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-11· cited 129×
- Ex Parte BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-15· cited 35×
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-23· cited 31×
- Ex Parte HannenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-04-12· cited 30×
- Ex Parte HatfieldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1951-03-14· cited 19×
- Ex Parte RubisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-12-07· cited 15×
- Bullock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-02-18· cited 5×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1942-01-14· cited 4×
- Ex parte CampbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-24· cited 2×
- Ybarra, Ex Parte Fermin MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-27
- in Re: Juan MurrayTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-04-07
- Wade, Alex Melvin AKA Wade, Alex JrCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-01
- in Re: Bobby Gene WoffordTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-11-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court· 1886-06-24· cited 50×
- Burnett v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 43×
- Perry v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 41×
- Chester v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1914-05-27· cited 26×
- Ximenes v. XimenesTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 16×
- Rhodes v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1867-01-15· cited 13×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1917-02-28· cited 10×
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1931-06-17· cited 7×
- Ex parte TraderCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1887-11-26· cited 7×
- Rehm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1936-11-04· cited 3×
- Scott v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.