Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/28/2005
Kirby v. State
Citations
- 822 N.E.2d 1097
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 280
- 2005 WL 455383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the post-conviction court could have reasonably inferred that the petitioner, who had had repeated contacts with the criminal justice system and had been incarcerated, would have enjoyed access to a law library where he could have learned about post-conviction remedies
- providing that the evidence was sufficient to prove that the State was prejudiced by the petitioner’s delay when the State demonstrated that some of the evidence used at trial had been destroyed and that the State was unable to locate all of the victims of the petitioner’s offenses
- reviewing the merits of a post-conviction petition, even though the sentence for the underlying conviction had been served, because “convictions have collateral consequences inasmuch as they . . . may form the basis of a habitual offender enhancement”
- reviewing the merits of a post- conviction petition, even though the sentence for the underlying conviction had been served, because “convictions have collateral consequences inasmuch as they . . . may form the basis of a habitual offender enhancement”
- “[Prejudice exists when the unreasonable delay operates to materially diminish a reasonable likelihood of successful re-prosecution.” (Citation omitted)
- “The [government] has an obligation to use due diligence in its investigation of the availability of evidence and witnesses.” (Citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Sullivan, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-01· cited 33×
- Oliver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-13· cited 31×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-07· cited 20×
- Hamed v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-15· cited 9×
- Jay R. Thompson v. Richard BrownSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 2×
- Charles A. Edmonson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-11-09· cited 1×
- Araujo v. StateSuperior Court of Rhode Island· 2010-02-12
- Joshua M. Wren v. Reed RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2019-12-26
- Frank Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-04-24
- Commitment of M TIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-09-14
- Commitment of C PIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-09-14
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Perry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-04· cited 57×
- In Re the Marriage of StarihaIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-06-29· cited 35×
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-21· cited 30×
- Lacy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 30×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-29· cited 20×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-05-20· cited 17×
- Mahone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-01-22· cited 9×
- McCollum v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-10-08· cited 8×
- McCollum v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-03· cited 6×
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-08-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.