Skip to main content

Kirby v. State

Citations

  • 822 N.E.2d 1097
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 280
  • 2005 WL 455383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that the post-conviction court could have reasonably inferred that the petitioner, who had had repeated contacts with the criminal justice system and had been incarcerated, would have enjoyed access to a law library where he could have learned about post-conviction remedies
  • providing that the evidence was sufficient to prove that the State was prejudiced by the petitioner’s delay when the State demonstrated that some of the evidence used at trial had been destroyed and that the State was unable to locate all of the victims of the petitioner’s offenses
  • reviewing the merits of a post-conviction petition, even though the sentence for the underlying conviction had been served, because “convictions have collateral consequences inasmuch as they . . . may form the basis of a habitual offender enhancement”
  • reviewing the merits of a post- conviction petition, even though the sentence for the underlying conviction had been served, because “convictions have collateral consequences inasmuch as they . . . may form the basis of a habitual offender enhancement”
  • “[Prejudice exists when the unreasonable delay operates to materially diminish a reasonable likelihood of successful re-prosecution.” (Citation omitted)
  • “The [government] has an obligation to use due diligence in its investigation of the availability of evidence and witnesses.” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Sullivan, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.