Perrin v. Perrin

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 2581

Syllabus

Custody domestic relations postdecree shared parenting plan relocation best interest of the child motion in limine abuse of discretion R.C. 3109.04 attorney fees. The domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion in limine seeking to limit the introduction of evidence of predecree facts and circumstances. The issue was repeatedly addressed throughout trial, the court appropriately considered the evidentiary arguments, and the court's rulings were not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant-appellant's motion to modify the shared parenting plan because there had been no change in circumstances pursuant to R.C. 3109.04(E)(1). Finally, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff-appellee $5,000 in attorney fees and litigation expenses.