State v. Dranse

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1475

Syllabus

Motion in limine consecutive sentencing R.C. 2929.14(C) Reagan Tokes Law. The trial court did not err in granting the state's motion in limine regarding a witness's testimony because such testimony was admissible hearsay. The trial court failed to make the necessary findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C) when imposing consecutive sentences. The appellant's sentence, according to the Reagan Tokes Law, has been ruled constitutional.