Perez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for the plain view doctrine to apply, \[t]he officer must come across the evidence inadvertently\
• for the plain view doctrine to apply, \[t]he incriminating nature of the evidence must be immediately apparent on its face.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rimmer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 92×
• Moreland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-20· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Doria
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-03· cited 5×
• State v. Gayle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-24· cited 2×
• Freeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-28· cited 1×
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1989-11-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Payton v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
• Arizona v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
• Ensor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-04· cited 198×
• Carlton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-03-08· cited 36×
• Booze v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-03-08· cited 14×
• State v. Carson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-11· cited 7×
• Sims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-07· cited 5×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-19· cited 4×
• Streeter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-02· cited 1×